by DanielBl » Thu Jun 14, 2012 06:37:14 PM
I wasn't referring, in particular, to your use of the term "judgment proof," but instead, to its general widespread use. It's largely true because most institutions and debt buyers won't bother to sue those in bad financial condition, due to the difficulty of collecting. Nevertherless, there are still some who will sue no matter what, Natale Law Offices being a case in point.
There always will be a few creditors who are content to wait indefinitely until one comes into money and then strike when least expected. You get up for work one morning, years later, and your new car is missing from the driveway; you can't sell your house because the buyer's lawyer sees a lien registered against its title; you come to your bank one day to find that it's been cleaned out.
Therefore, using the suffix "proof" can lead to a false sense of security.