by footloose » Tue Sep 21, 2010 07:57:10 PM
I apologize for any misunderstandings that you may have. At no time did I consider you deceitful but there was a general lack of information in your previous blogs and it appeared that you were seeking assistance while suppressing some basic facts. This is very common on this website and without knowing the background and detailed information about a blogger's problem, it becomes very difficult to provide proper guidance and advice. I now have a much clearer picture of your situation.
First, let me give you some of my personal observations. You indicated that you lived in subsidized housing for 16 years paying rent to a rental agency ( who I assume was collecting these rents on behalf of the landlord ). It has been my experience in dealing with subsidized or rent-geared-to-income housing that the vast majority of the tenants are at the low income scale. This would include welfare recipients, tenants on long-term disability, pensioners who receive very modest pensions and others who are in minimum wage jobs. Their incomes are not sufficient to be able to afford market rent accommodation. I have also observed
( with noted exceptions ) that these tenants tend to be more troublesome to a landlord than tenants living in market rent accommodation. Such examples would include non-payment of rent, late payment of rent, damage to the interior of the rental unit, vacating the unit in the middle of the night, all-night parties affecting other tenant's right to peaceful enjoyment of their unit, police raids and drug dealing in the hallways and stairwells. I have attended many landlord and tenant tribunals where the landlord is seeking to evict a tenant for a variety of reasons and the vast majority of these tenants are living in subsidized or rent-geared-to-income housing.
What am I saying? Landlords of these rental units have become so "hard-nosed" with these excessive problems and costs that they are not prepared to give any tenant or ex-tenant any financial leeway. They do not waste their time discussing or negotiating a bill or charge with a previous tenant. Either you pay the "freight" ( the bill ) or they "send the hounds after you" ( collection agency ). They have a very "itchy finger on the trigger" and they don't hesitate to pull it.
In your case, the chances of this bill being changed or adjusted is next to NIL. Even in your situation while I'm sure that you are very honest and a reputable person ( living in the same location for 10 years tells me that )
these landlords don't play favourites and paint everyone with the same brush. Having said all of that, the real bad news is that this collection account will stay on your credit file for 6 and 7 years with Equifax and TransUnion respectively, regardless if you pay it or not. The good news is the likelihood of you being sued in Small Claims Court is next to NIL.
On the off-chance that the Capital Regional Housing Authority decides to initiate a lawsuit, I believe that you could offer a valid defence. Judges tend to offer a sympathetic ear to tenants who play by the rules.
In regards to your line of credit at the bank, I would suggest that you visit your bank manager again and explain the situation to him/her. Ask the manager that if you paid this outstanding bill in full, would that be sufficient to obtain a line of credit.( assuming your credit score is adequate for the loan ). If the answer is YES, go for it. If the answer is NO, I see no reason to pay this bill. Paying this bill will not change your credit file other than it will say "paid by debtor" and it will certainly not increase your credit score. However, it's your call.
Good Luck and have a GREAT DAY