Jeez sorry I posted in the other forum where there were no replies...LOL
Anyway to whomever said the charge is theft under $500.00 (T.J. was that you?) forgot to add the extra zero, it's theft under $5-thousand dollars.
Some time ago the threshhold was theft under/over $200.00 (see the movie made in 2003 called "Owning Mahowny" where Dan was charged with theft over $200.00 when he stole upwards of $10-million from CIBC to have a good time in Atlantic City and Vegas)..."It's like the Superbowl in there!!!" Shit, if he had just left right then he would have been up money enough to pay back the bank, but I digress...
Then it was increased to theft over/under $1,000...
and more recently now it's theft over/under $5,000.
Golly, gotta love inflation!
Generally, theft under is prosecuted as a summary (misdemeanor) offence and theft over is usually prosecuted as an indictable offence. This is roughly equivalent to a felony in the U.S. Both crimes will render you inadmissible to the U.S. as they are considered "crimes of moral turpitude". No, not turpentine, lol...that's used for paint thinner silly!
So there's your edumacation for today as I have f all better to do today except to spew gray matter :))
But as for the O.P. don't worry so much, you're no Dan Mahowny... Or our erstwhile rip-off artists residing in all levels of our government giving us bad examples (hey, they should know better!)
Phillip Seymour-Hoffman played Dan, and I've followed his career since then and as you can tell I'm a fan...