by Carmine » Sat Sep 05, 2009 11:02:53 AM
Thanks for pointing that out, very informative! Especially this (by Raymond):
"That's why, if you have old account statements or some such thing to present to the bureau with the right information, things become a lot easier. Then they will have little choice but to make the correction or make a serious effort with the creditor to corroborate the info"
This is why I am debating as to the timing I should produce my evidence to the bureau. Here's my thinking:
Scenario 1:
a) Start the dispute, but do not send evidence
b) Bureau calls creditor
c) I am lucky and the creditor gives the same information I have printed out in a statement and a manager's letter. Namely, balance is $0 credit limit is still there.
d) Hence bureau cannot verify this is a 'bad debt'
e) entry has to be removed
Scenario 2:
a) Start the dispute, but do not send evidence
b) Bureau calls creditor
c) Creditor for whatever reason says this is a bad debt.
d) I then produce my evidence where the same creditor basically says this is not bad debt.
e) Now what?
Scenario 3:
a) Start the dispute, produce all my evidence
b) Bureau calls the creditor
c) May be a longer process and a he says/she says game
At this point, based on Raymond explanation of how things work, I am more inclined to just produce everything right away that way they should be forced to act. Is this wise?